Anjuman-e-Gharib Nawaz
Dewsbury UK
Jilani mias persistent fraud & foolishness NEW
Molvi Abul Hasan ''Azhari'' or ''Fajari'' ? NEW
Sayyad Rashid Miyas Contradictions NEW
Ashraf al Fatawa
Mahe Noor : Abul Hasan Farooqi's shameful LIE
Jilani miya's supposed resignation?
Clarification
Has Jilani mia cut all his links with the Farooqis ?
Mufti Shamsuddoha & Sons Abusive Activities Exposed Again !!!
Mufti Shamsuddoha's & Sons double standards Exposed
Mufti Shamsuddoha's sons abuse Jilani mia and their own mother
Jilani mias' Latest Big Lie Exposed
Response to Musanna mia's book
Download - Reflection of Truth
Janasheen of a 'stick'
Response to an Open Letter
Read all the facts and information of the true progeny of
Hadrat Abul Ghawth Rahmatullahi 'alayh
Mufti Shamsuddoha & Sons | Furec & Farooqi | Abul Gawth Farooqi | The Fitna
ANJUMAN E GARIB NAWAZ
DEWSBURY
JUNE 2007
JILANI MIYA’S PERSISTENT FRAUD & FOOLISHNESS
Recently on Jilani Miya’s SF.org website, a document was uploaded allegedly written by Mufti Abdul Qadeer Rizvi of Kanpur, UP, India titled ‘Fraud of Ashraf al Fatawa’ which makes two devious and deceptive claims. Before we deal with the contents of the document we would like to bring to the attention of our readers that despite numerous attempts to locate ‘Mufti Abdul Qadeer Rizvi’ he has not been found.
Why? Because no such person exists! This is Jilani Miya and his demented friends’ attempt to defend Jilani Miya’s infidelity and in the process abuse scholars of Islam using the name of a person who does not exist!
Let us now look at the content of this document. It makes two bogus claims.
1. The first claim is that Hadrat Shaykh ul Islam and Hadrat Gazi e Millat became infidels many years ago [Astagfirallah, Maz'allah] and they should repent for their infidelity etc. What this has to do with Ashraf al Fatawa is beyond our understanding but what surprises us that Jilani Miya obviously didn’t think either of these esteemed personalities had any charges against them when he was kissing their hands in 2005! Now he has been declared an infidel, instead of repenting he tries to throw the charge of infidelity against anyone who does not take his side especially esteemed members of his own family. And then he has the nerve to say that ‘faqir Ashrafi’ neither has a negative mentality or destructive mind. As has been said about him previously his behaviour is the same as a drunkard giving a speech on the damage alcohol can cause!!
The Islamic ruling for a person who makes a false accusation of infidelity against a fellow Muslim is that the charge is returned to the accuser. Obviously in Jilani Miya’s case it makes no difference to his condition as he is already considered an infidel by a consensus of scholars due to his involvement in FUREC!
2. The second claim relates to a statement by Hadrat Khwaja Muzaffar Hussain who is an elderly and ill scholar in India to show the alleged fraud of Ashraf al Fatawa. Khwaja Muzaffar gave a written statement to Jilani Miya’s stooges on 20 November 2006 based on what he was told by these fraudsters. In it he wrote:
‘Since “FUREC” organisation consists of several infidelities and unbelief, so the participation of any Muslim is absolutely not right rather it is prohibited and forbidden. But Zaid who is a member and is presenting his excuse with the clarification from the very first day of its launch. So, in such situation the charge of infidelity upon Zaid in not right unless it is proved with sharai (religious) reason and proof that he (Zaid) has held this organisation true from the very first day and when he felt under the scan of religious law then later he interpreted it with an ulterior motive. Since Zaid is a Muslim so his own clarification should be considered as true. So in this matter Zaid is defendant and the claimants are the levellers of charge. So, it is compulsory on the claimants to prove with religious argument and reason that this interpretation has been concocted by Zaid. If it is proved with religious reason and argument then the edict of infidelity is correct and right. (Allah is All knowing).
When some people discussed it over the phone we expressed the same opinion mentioned above. During the course of the discussion over the phone with the callers, we had first written it on the paper and then spoke while reading on paper. We also clarified it to the people that this is our opinion and not an edict. ‘
Khawaja Muzaffar Hussein
20th Nov. 2006
(Taken from the SF.org website).
Jilani Miya is fraudulently relying on this statement to try and discredit Ashraf al Fatawa. What Jilani Miya is not telling us is that once Khwaja Muzaffar became aware of Jilani Miya’s activities in FUREC he corrected his position immediately and gave another statement on 5 December 2006 which he also published in the January 2007 edition of the Jame Noor magazine published from Delhi in which he endorsed the edicts contained in Ashraf al Fatawa.
In any event, let us examine what Khwaja Muzaffar has said and what Jilani Miya is relying on because even in this statement Jilani Miya does not escape the charge of infidelity.
Khwaja Muzaffar writes that FUREC consists of several infidelities and states that the participation of any Muslim in FUREC is not right; rather it is prohibited and forbidden. But the charge of infidelity on Zaid (Jilani Miya) is not right unless it is proved with religious reason and proof.
The reason Khwaja Muzaffar said that this charge was not right unless proven otherwise was because he was relying on Jilani Miya’s false claim that the meaning of the infidelity containing words were explained and clarified at FUREC’s very first meeting.
Khwaja Muzaffar was not aware at the time that no such clarification had been made at any meeting of FUREC. Jilani Miya prior to this statement had never mentioned any clarifications but had only talked of a fraudulent amendment which Gazi e Millat Sayyad Muhammad Hashmi Miya in his book the Light of Truth has comprehensively dealt with.
Even if what Jilani Miya and his stooges had told Khwaja Muzaffar was believed Jilani Miya still doesn’t escape the charge of infidelity against him as a result of him signing and endorsing the Surat Spiritual Declaration in October 2003, nine months before FUREC came into existence whose clauses also contains numerous infidelities.
In addition Khwaja Muzaffar places a caveat when he mentions the infidelity of Zaid. He says that Zaid cannot be declared an infidel until proven with religious reasons and proof. By the grace of Allah Almighty this has been done and edicts giving reasons and proofs all appear in the book Ashraf al Fatawa. Even on the document Jilani Miya relies on he cannot escape the charge of infidelity.
What our readers should also remember is that Khwaja Muzaffar is not a Mufti and in his statement he clearly writes that what he has written ‘is our opinion and not an edict.’ We have to wonder why it is that Jilani Miya is giving so much weight to an opinion of a person who is not a Mufti and does not mention the numerous edicts of Muftis contained in Ashraf al Fatawa which declare him an infidel including those Muftis whose praises he was singing until recently. Does he now think the Muftis from places such as Darul Uloom Amjadiya, Ghosi, Darul Uloom Manzare Islam, Bareilly Sharif, Jamia Naeemia, Muradabad and Jame Ashraf in Kicchocha Shairf etc which he so vocally relied on a few months ago have all got their rulings wrong?
Why doesn’t Jilani Miya mention the fact that he personally went to see the Chief Mufti at Al Jamiatul Ashrafiya, Mubarakpur, UP, India, Hadrat Mufti Nizamuddin Rizwi Sahib after his comments appeared in Ashraf al Fatawa stating that Jilani Miya had to repent? Jilani Miya tried desperately to try and persuade Mufti Nizamuddin to change his mind but left in despair and despondency as he was told that he was under a charge of infidelity and had no alternative except to repent?
Or mention that Muhaddis e Kabir Allama Zia ul Mustapha Qadri and Behrul Uloom Mufti Abdul Mannan Sahib are also quoted in Ashraf al Fatawa as stating that he has to repent for his involvement in FUREC?
Jilani Miya blatantly lies to try and save himself. He has done this since he was first charged with infidelity due to his involvement in FUREC and it appears that he will continue to do so in the hope that he can deceive Muslims all over the world. He doesn’t seem to understand that he is deceiving no one but himself. His lackeys including Musanna Miya, Rashid Miya, Khalid Miya, Mufti Shamsuddoha, Molvi Abul Hasan Fajari, Zafar Iqbal Faruqi and other members of these families despite knowing of these lies and deceptions continue to support him - some in return for financial help and others in return for help with their continuing attempts to falsely claim they are sayyads.
Now let us look at what Khwaja Muzaffar has said in Ashraf al Fatawa and in the written clarification he gave in the monthly magazine Jame Noor.
Khwaja Muzaffar states as written in Ashraf al Fatawa on page 132:
‘Infidelity is dripping from each and every hair of FUREC. I believe Jilani Miya to be severely misguided and someone who is misguiding others. On the basis of Kufr fikahi it is essential for him to repent and retract. But for Kufr kalami it is necessary to research the circumstances and my health is not in the best condition. I am unwell and therefore I cannot conduct detailed and thorough evidence based research.
Khustar Noorani, Mufti A’le Mustapha Misbahi, Mowlana Saif Khalid are all witnesses to Khwaja Muzaffar’s comments. Neither Jilani Miya nor Khwaja Muzaffar can deny that this statement was made as there are three scholars who are witnesses and our understanding is that there are more witnesses available to confirm these comments.
And on Page 53 in the January 2007 edition of Jame Noor under the heading ‘Important Announcement’ Khwaja Muzaffar writes:
‘The writer has read and seen the Surat Spiritual Declaration and the constitution of FUREC and after reading them has reached the conclusion that the above mentioned Surat Spiritual Declaration and Constitution in numerous clauses is against Islam and is clear infidelity. After becoming aware of the infidelity containing clauses involvement in these organisations is not only becoming misguided but is infidelity.
The edicts that have been given by the scholars of Islam against the clauses of FUREC are true and are correct. But as far as a person becoming an infidel based on his involvement in the above mentioned organisation is concerned then it is a separate issue. I am at present ill and bed ridden and due to my illness I am unable to express an opinion on a matter as delicate as infidelity and therefore I cannot express any ruling on this matter.
It is my desire to all parties concern that after this explanation, they do not take the trouble to contact me regarding this matter as this is my final written word on this issue.’
Readers will note that Khwaja Muzaffar accepts that FUREC and the Surat Spiritual Declaration contain numerous infidelity containing clauses. He has accepted that the edicts given by Muftis contained in Ashraf al Fatawa against FUREC are correct. He has in conversations with Islamic Scholars called Jilani Miya a person who is not only misguided but is misguiding others and in writing stated that due to his ill health he has been unable to deal with the issue of infidelity in an edict.
Now that we have shown our readers the reality of Khwaja Muzaffar’s statements it will have become clear that Jilani Miya’s attempts to use him to show that Ashraf al Fatawa is a fraud, is in actual fact the real fraud and deception.
Jilani Miya foolishly thinks that by using the names of other scholars and continuing to try and make what is wholly a matter of Sharia into a personal matter, he will detract people from the charge of infidelity against him. He is as foolish in thinking this as he was in becoming a founder member of FUREC.
We would like to remind Jilani Miya that he is powerless to remove the strangulation of the charge of infidelity from around his neck and anything he does except repenting as required in Sharia will be unable to save him.
ANJUMAN E GARIB NAWAZ
DEWSBURY
Email: agndewsbury@hotmail.co.uk
top
ANJUMAN E GARIB NAWAZ
DEWSBURY
June 2007
A’SAR-E-QIYAMAH, MUFTI SHAMSUDDOHA & SONS ONGOING DECEPTION
MOLVI ABUL HASAN “AZHARI” OR “FAJARI”?
Anjuman e Garib Nawaz, Dewsbury is utterly convinced that the behaviour and actions of Mufti Shamsuddoha and his sons are undoubtedly ‘A’sar-e-Qiyamah’ - signs that the day of Judgment is approaching!
Just when we thought there was nothing more we could bring to our readers attention which would show Mufti Shamsuddoha and his sons disgraceful and fraudulent behaviour, we learn of another of Molvi Abul Hasan’s schemes to deceive Sunni Muslims. This latest deception Anjuman e Garib Nawz has learned of is almost comical and if it wasn’t such a serious matter it would be utterly hilarious.
Molvi Abul Hasan writes that he is an ‘Azhari’ after his name. He has done this in his 'Mahe Noor' magazine published from India, on posters for programmes he organises and attends, as well as on his family website; and he has also asked people to refer to him when writing his name as ‘Azhari.’ In short he wants people to call him an ‘Azhari’ and actually believe that he is an ‘Azhari.’
The reason a person writes ‘Azhari’ after his name is to show that he has studied and obtained a qualification from the world famous and renowned Al Azhar Islamic University in Cairo, Egypt. This qualification is usually for completion of a graduate or postgraduate level course to show that a person has actually studied and completed his course at Al Azhar University.
This use of the title is for normal and honest students who have actually spent time often in difficult circumstances and situations studying at the Al Azhar University. But let us look at why Molvi Abul Hasan writes that he is an ‘Azhari.’
In April 1999 Molvi Abul Hasan went to Cairo to study at an institution we believe is called Al Fajr. He stayed in Cairo for six weeks and did a basic level course in spoken Arabic for beginners. Al Fajr was a private institution being run and managed by a few tutors. It is not linked to or associated with the famous Al Azhar University whatsoever. The time Molvi Abul Hasan spent in Cairo can no doubt be confirmed from the entries on his passport which will show a stay in Egypt of around six weeks.
During the course of this stay in Cairo Molvi Abul Hasan visited Al Azhar University for approximately 45 minutes in a similar manner to a tourist who would visit this prestigious institute of learning. This period of 45 minutes was the only time he spent at Al Azhar University while in Cairo.
On his return to the UK Molvi Abul Hasan started to write that he was an ‘Azhari’ implying that he was a graduate of this prestigious University to give weight and add prestige to his name. This behaviour was not only dishonest but a devious attempt to mislead Muslims.
To try and give a better understanding of what Molvi Abul Hasan has tried to do, we have set out an example of an imaginary and devious tourist visiting the UK!
A tourist from India arrives in the UK and while on his visit decides to learn to speak basic English. He finds and enrols at a private college for adult learning to do a basic course in spoken English in the city of Cambridge. After spending six weeks in Cambridge completing his course he decides to visit as a tourist the world renowned and academically excellent University of Cambridge. He visits this prestigious University for one hour in which he sees its historic libraries, lecture halls and gardens. He later returns to India where he starts to inform people that he studied at the University of Cambridge and also starts to write the word ‘Cantab’ after his name to show he is a graduate of Cambridge University! He takes the same title as someone who has spent either three years studying a course at an undergraduate level, or at least one year studying at postgraduate level at Cambridge University to try and deceive people in India that he is actually a graduate of Cambridge University. He does this so that he can benefit socially and financially and so that he can show that he has the intelligence and work ethos to gain entry and study at Cambridge University.
This is the same as what Molvi Abul Hasan has done. He spends six weeks doing a basic level spoken course in Arabic at Al Fajr but takes the same name as a graduate of Al Azhar University for prestige and social and financial benefits. Such is his enthusiasm to use the term ‘Azhari’ after his name that he actually forgets that he may one day be found out and advertises this wherever he possibly can. Can there be a greater deception than this?
Worse still his father who supposedly is a ‘Shamsul Ulema’ and ‘Mufti’ takes no action against his son’s devious use of the term ‘Azhari.’ Mufti Shamsuddoha knows full well that a person cannot write ‘Azhari’ after his name after having spent six weeks at Al Fajr but he chooses to ignore his son’s behaviour and allows him to continue peddling these lies in the hope and belief that this deception will bring worldly benefits and rewards. Not only is Molvi Abul Hasan involved in this deception but so too is his father! If this is the behaviour of so called Islamic scholars are we not right to conclude that the day of Judgment is fast approaching and these people are signs that the day of Judgment is not far?
It has previously been proven beyond any doubt that Molvi Abul Hasan isn’t a sayyad. Now we have proven that he isn’t an ‘Azhari.’ I wonder what else we will learn of in future about this fully feathered bird which is beginning to lose its wings and feathers!!!
Anjuman e Garib Nawaz believes that Molvi Abul Hasan should write ‘Fajari’ after his name to show that he has completed a six week course at Al Fajr. We are being generous in allowing him to use ‘Fajari’ even though he has spent only six weeks doing a course and is not a graduate of Al Fajr. He should immediately ensure that on all the posters that he prepares or that are prepared containing his name as well as all future 'Mahe Noor' publications and any other publication he is associated with refer to him as Molvi Abul Hasan Fajari.
May Allah Almighty give Molvi Abul Hasan Fajari the opportunity to repent and return to the true path of the righteous believers.
ANJUMAN E GARIB NAWAZ
DEWSBURY
ANJUMAN E GARIB NAWAZ
DEWSBURY
SAYYAD MUHAMMAD RASHID MAKKI’S CONTRADICTORY STATEMENT!
Recently on Jilani Miya’s deceitful website sf.org ‘a very important declaration for the people of Ahle Sunnah’ appeared in which Sayyad Muhammad Rashid Makki son of Sayyad Hasan Musanna Anwar sought to clarify his and his father’s position regarding the issue of Jilani Miya’s infidelity due to his involvement in FUREC.
In this ‘important declaration’ Sayyad Rashid Makki writes that some mischief creating people are playing a negative role and are trying to mislead the public for their personal gain and are spreading false rumours and lies about his and his father’s position, which he then describes in the following words taken from the deceitful website:
‘Whereas the fact is altogether different. Regarding this we want to clear our position that we belong to neither camp. So far as this issue of infidelity is concerned, neither my respected father nor I belong to this issue. Nor we have any difference with any body. Despite that we are being forcibly dragged in this issue. We never support infidelity nor will do in future.
But we will accept the unanimous religious injunction of the learned scholars of Ahle Sunnat based on logical and argumentative reason and proof in the light of sacred divine laws. We will declare our support heartily by accepting and favouring the religious laws. In this regard we will go against those who do not accept the injunction based on the interpretation of religious law. Whether he belongs to our own family or the outside, since divine laws are far superior to any one else and we have full faith on it.’
This is a quite extraordinary and utterly misleading statement. The most outrageous comment in this declaration is that Rashid Miya says that he and his father do not belong to this issue. Why not? This is an issue of Sharia – of infidelity and faith. If he or his father are not involved in issues of faith then what have they been doing for the past 20 years when going on preaching tours and meeting people and trying to persuade them to stay away from misguided people??? Or is it that they do not want the principles of faith and Sharia to apply to people close to them but are happy for these to apply to others they have no relations with???
Rashid Miya further writes that he and his father are not in favour or against anyone - yet for the past two years both have spent their entire energy in support of Jilani Miya. Jilani Miya’s generosity has ensured Rashid Miya, his brothers and their father became enthusiastic cheerleaders once the charge of infidelity was laid at his door. Prior to the charge of infidelity Jilani Miya’s activities according to Rashid Miya’s father was a ‘Spiritual Circus.’
The very fact that Rashid Miya’s statement appears on Jilani Miya’s sf.org website and which has also been translated into English is evidence enough as to which side Rashid Miya is on – the side whose main protagonist has been declared an infidel by a consensus of Islamic Scholars and Muftis!
Rashid Miya’s father Sayyad Hasan Musanna Miya has been supporting Jilani Miya openly for quite sometime. In case Rashid Miya has short term memory loss we would like to remind him that his father wrote a book called ‘Ai’na e Sadaqat’ or Transparency of Truth which Anjuman Garib Nawaz gave a detailed response to and which can be found at http://www.thelightoftruth.org/anjumanegharibnawaz.htm#89005938
This book by Musanna Miya is a defence of Jilani Miya’s involvement in FUREC and also contains many personal attacks on Hadrat Shaykh ul Islam. After Musanna Miya wrote this book, his position in support of Jilani Miya became abundantly clear and since then, the Sunni public has thought of him and his sons as wholehearted and fervent supporters of Jilani Miya. Indeed one of Musanna Miya’s sons who is also Jilani Miya’s son in law has been very active in spreading lies and propaganda in support of his generous father in law.
Bearing in mind the above, who then is Rashid Miya referring to when he states that he and his father are being forcibly involved in this matter? Once Musanna Miya made his position clear he hasn’t been approached by anyone from the side of truth and neither has anyone except Jilani Miya held out any hope from him. So perhaps Rashid Miya is actually referring to Jilani Miya when he says that he and his father have been forced by someone to get involved in this matter - and forced Musanna Miya to write his book? So therefore is it Jilani Miya who is the mischief maker who is spreading rumours about rashid Miya and his father and getting them involved in this matter for personal gain??? Perhaps Rashid Miya would like to clarify this.
Rashid Miya also writes that he and his father will accept the ruling of Sharia made by the Scholars of Ahle Sunnah based on evidence and proof and logical argument. Again we would like to remind Rashid Miya of what his father has already written in his book. Musanna Miya writes:
‘This is true that last year in a function at Bolton I had said something with regard to Deen-e-Ilahi so far as the constitution of FUREC is concerned, which had been mentioned earlier. But it was my first review. Later after consulting scholars and edictees when the reality of the situation cleared to me then I kept mum.’
Musanna Miya’s first reaction was that FUREC was similar to the concept of Deen e Ilahi as espoused by King Akbar which Mujaddid e Alif e Sani (Blessings be Upon Him) fought against yet when he allegedly consulted scholars and Muftis he changed his mind.
Rashid Miya now states that he and his father will accept the ruling of the Scholars of Islam if it is given in light of proof and evidence and the Sharia! Either Rashid Miya or his father now believe that when Musanna Miya allegedly first consulted Scholars they did not give their answers based on facts and evidence or believe that the answers were illogical and not in light of Sharia.
It would have been far better if Rashid Miya had clarified with his father who in his own published words supposedly had already consulted scholars and Muftis and decided that Jilani Miya’s involvement in FUREC was fine and not un-Islamic before making his contradictory and odd ‘important declaration’!
We say ‘allegedly’ consulted scholars because at another point in his book Musanna Miya says that he changed his mind once Mufti Moin Sambhali coincidentally arrived at Musanna Miya’s house and looked at the documentation of FUREC which Musanna Miya gave him. This was one person, not many scholars! Mufti Moin told him that
‘I have pondered over all the pros and cons of the letter on your request but there is no thing found as such which casts doubt of infidelity’
as a result of which Musanna Miya felt;
‘this feeling created tremble in my whole body and sought pardon in the court of Allah the Almighty of what I committed. At that moment I told Khalid Miyan to inform his uncle that my father is separating himself from this issue due to fear of the Hereafter. He should review his decision…’
And in any event what does Rashid Miya think all the Muftis and Scholars who have given their edicts based on evidence and opinion and compiled in the book ‘Ashraf ul Fatawa’ have done? Are these answers not based on evidence and in light of the rulings of Sharia? Is he and his father seriously suggesting that the Muftis from the main Sunni institutions of Bareilly, Muradabad, Ghosi, Kicchocha etc have not given rational answers and have not provided answers based on the teachings of Islam?
Rashid Miya and his father are playing a manipulative and deceptive game. On the one hand they make contradictory statements thinking that no one will realise that they are saying all things to all men to please everyone – which is the classic positioning of a two faced person. On the other hand and more importantly, in private they are telling Jilani Miya that they are fully supportive of him and will stand shoulder to shoulder with him presumably in return for a healthy financial recompense and promises of other rewards by Jilani Miya. Yet mischievously they are telling people that they are not on anyone’s side but will follow the ruling of Sharia – but when the ruling has been given, they are not prepared to accept it.
Anjuman e Garib Nawaz challenges Rashid Miya and his father to clarify their position in writing regarding Ashraf al Fatawa.
Do they accept the ruling contained in this book that Jilani Miya is an infidel and has to repent, reaffirm his faith, remarry and reconfirm his oath of allegiance (ba’it)?
Or do they believe that the Scholars and Muftis who have given their edicts and have endorsed these edicts have all given their answers without giving due thought and consideration of the actual facts and without giving due thought and consideration of Sharia?
Anjuman e Garib Nawaz Dewsbury does not hold much hope that Rashid Miya or his father will endorse Ashraf al Fatawa but both will continue to hide behind their feeble excuses of not being on anyone’s side when clearly they are supporting Jilani Miya and his infidelity.
We hope that Rashid Miya and his father and brothers realise what they are doing and disassociate themselves from Jilani Miya and save themselves from inevitable destruction.
ANJUMAN E GARIB NAWAZ
DEWSBURY
JANUARY 2007
ASHRAF UL FATAWA PUBLISHED
Anjuman e Garib Nawaz, Dewsbury can confirm that the book containing the edicts of the respected Muftis of Islam confirming Jilani Miya’s infidelity has now been compiled and published.
Kalimat ul Iman Fi Rad Wahdat ul Adyan in other words Ashraf ul Fatawa was published by Jamia Ashrafia Ma'ariful Qur'an, Kichocha Sharif, India in November 2006. It contains the edicts of Muftis confirming Jilani Miya's infidelity and a lengthy and detailed preface outlining the background of Jilani Miya’s involvement in FUREC written by Mowlana Qamar Ahmed Ashrafi.
The background to this book is that once Jilani Miya was accused of being an infidel as a result of his involvement in FUREC, he prepared and sent a fraudulent questionnaire to Muftis in India and Pakistan and deceived them by lying about his involvement in FUREC. He then used their answers to declare his innocence in Sharia which he published in his book the Declaration of Truth and on his website.
As a result of this fraudulent behaviour and the continuing lies and deception of Jilani Miya and his cronies, Mowlana Qamar Ahmed Ashrafi prepared two detailed questionnaires relating to the Surat Spiritual Declaration and FUREC and sent them to Muftis including those who Jilani Miya was declaring had cleared him of all charges of infidelity, in particular the following Muftis;
Hazrat Allama Mufti A’le Mustafa Misbahi, Chief Mufti of Darul Uloom Amjadiya, Ghosi
Hazrat Allama Mufti Farooq Ahmed Qadri Rizvi, Chief Mufti of Darul Uloom Manzare Islam, Bareilly Sharif
Hazrat Allama Mufti Muhammad Ayub Naeemi, Chief Mufti of Jamia Naeemia, Muradabad
The first questionnaire included questions requesting Sharia's ruling on the Surat Spiritual Declaration. The second questionnaire requested Sharia's ruling on FUREC's aims and objectives and the deception carried out by Jilani Miya against Islamic Scholars and Muftis as well as Sunni Muslims.
The responses received from all the Muftis including those mentioned above confirmed that as a result of Jilani Miya's involvement and endorsement of the SSD and of FUREC's aims and objectives; and thereafter publishing both under the aegis of his Spiritual Foundation organisation, he was an infidel and had to repent in Sharia and thereafter to reaffirm his faith, re-marry and retake an oath of allegiance (ba'it).
Once all the edicts were received, a final letter was sent by Mowlana Qamar Ahmed Ashrafi to Jilani Miya informing him of the replies and asking him to repent in Sharia especially as those Muftis who he was stating had declared him innocent had now proclaimed him to be an infidel. Jilani Miya did not reply to this letter and thereafter these edicts together with a detailed preface was published with the name Ashraf ul Fatawa.
The conclusion of this book is that there is consensus among the Sunni Scholars of India regarding Jilani Miya’s infidelity.
Anjuman e Garib Nawaz in due course will bring a translation of the two questionnaires sent by Mowlana Qamar Ahmed Ashrafi and a summary of the edicts given by the respected Muftis.
ANJUMAN E GARIB NAWAZ
DEWSBURY
SEPTEMBER 2006
ABUL HASAN FAROOQI’S SHAMEFUL LIE EXPOSED!
Anjuman e Garib Nawaz, Dewsbury in this pamphlet once again exposes the shameful lies, deceit and false propaganda of the sons of Mufti Shamsuddoha Farooqi of Blackburn relating to Hazrat Abul Gaus Garam Diwan Shah (Blessings be Upon Him).
This time it is the fraudulent activities of Molvi Abul Hasan Farooqi who we are exposing and highlighting. It doesn’t surprise us that Molvi Abul Hasan Farooqi is spreading blatant lies as he has the most to lose from the truth being known, especially as he wants to be the Janashin (of a stick) after Mufti Shamsuddoha and stop his elder brother Zafar Iqbal who also wants the post from taking this seat.
Molvi Abul Hasan Farooqi is the proprietor, publisher and owner of the Urdu monthly magazine ‘Mahe Noor’ which is distributed from New Delhi, India and which allegedly is an Islamic magazine trying to improve the lives of those Muslims who read it. It is funded by the Choksi family based in Toronto, Canada who Molvi Abul Hasan Farooqi is devoted to and spends considerable time with.
In the August 2006 edition of Mahe Noor on pages 22 to 25 an article allegedly written by Muhammad Zafaruddin Barkati (we understand on the orders of Molvi Abul Hasan) appears which is a short tribute to the life of Hazrat Abul Gaus (Blessings be Upon Him).
We do not wish to comment at this stage on anything contained in the article except two fraudulent claims that have been made.
1. The false claim of Hazrat Abul Gaus (Blessings be Upon Him) being a sayyad (page 22).
We, along with others have dealt with this issue previously and have set out the ancestry of Hazrat Abul Gaus (Blessings be Upon Him) proving conclusively that he was of Farooqi descent (see Hadrat Abul Gauth Farooqi).
We have recently made further inquiries in India which we will bring to our readers in due course and learnt that in Lohra near Mubarakpur and in the surrounding towns it was accepted by everyone that Mufti Shamsuddoha and his family were of Farooqi descent.
It therefore appears that Mufti Shamsuddoha decided to call himself a sayyad once he got married – perhaps forcibly taking it as a gift of dowry????
2. On page 25, column two, line numbers 17-19 of the August 2006 edition of Mahe Noor, the following is stated:
‘Aap ka mazar sharif khanqah Dhawa sharif Gazipur ke ahat ke sab se aage gol gunbad me waqe hai.’
‘[Hazrat Abul Guas’] grave [or tomb] is to the front of the enclosure at Khanqah Dhawa Sharif, Gazipur in the round minaret.’
This is a shameful and blatant lie. Hazrat Abul Gaus’ shrine is not in Dhawa in any enclosure; or in or under any round minaret, but is actually in Lohra near Mubarakpur which Abul Hasan or any of his family members never ever visit.
As we have stated previously the ‘main shrine’ in Dhawa allegedly contains the stick belonging to Hazrat Abul Gaus (see our previous article ‘Janashin of a Stick’).
This fact is even accepted by Mufti Shamsuddoha but to try and deceive the Sunni public Molvi Abul Hasan is happy to circulate outrageous lies in a so called Islamic magazine!
It should be borne in mind that as proprietor, publisher and owner of Mahe Noor, Molvi Abul Hasan is responsible for what is contained in the magazine and would definitely know about this bogus claim.
We believe it has been made with his full knowledge and approval and on his recommendation to try and divert attention of Sunni Muslims that the shrine in Dhawa contains only a stick.
It should be borne in mind that Molvi Abul Hasan is an Imam at a Mosque in Blackburn where he leads the Jumma and other prayers. A person who blatantly lies and commits such sins is a fasiq (sinner), which means he is not fit to be an Imam and lead any prayer, and those praying behind him will not have their prayers accepted if he is their Imam. He also leads the ‘taraveeh’ in Ramadan but in Sharia should not do so as he has committed a terrible sin.
We wonder what those in Canada financing Molvi Abul Hasan’s magazine would make of the way their money is spent – is this why they have funded him???? Do they want to be a party to the propagating of such monstrous lies in the name of Islam???
We wonder what the committee of the Mosque where Molvi Abul Hasan is an Imam will make of this behaviour.
We hope and pray that all Sunni Muslims keep as far away as possible from Molvi Abul Hasan Farooqi and his family. We pray that Allah Almighty give Molvi Abul Hasan guidance to improve his behaviour so that he stops himself from spreading any more outrageous lies. Ameen
ANJUMAN E GARIB NAWAZ
DEWSBURY
SEPTEMBER 2006
JILANI MIYA RESIGNS FROM FUREC – BUT DOES NOT REPENT OR ACCEPT INFIDELITY CONTAINED IN FUREC!!!
Anjuman e Garib Nawaz Dewsbury is pleased to learn that Jilani Miya has ''resigned'' as a member of FUREC - BUT regrettably he still hasn’t repented in Sharia for being a founder member of an organisation containing apostasy and infidelity.
Jilani Miya’s resignation was posted on the Spiritual Foundation website and was also published by Jilani Miya on 30 August 2006 in a newspaper in Lucknow, UP, India.
Jilani Miya is recorded on his website as stating the following (their translation, not ours):
‘Gentlemen! It is informed that due to his hectic schedule, Faqeer Ashrafi kept himself away from FUREC organisation and could not attend its any meeting and programme and now under the above mentioned tragic and distressing incidents and circumstances and for the settlement of dispute he has resigned from FUREC in writing so that the mischievous elements could no longer get any opportunity to play their deceitful game with the lives of the people.’
Although Jilani Miya still hasn’t accepted that FUREC is an organisation containing infidelity and apostasy and continues to tell lies unashamedly, and despite the fact that he continues to abuse the Scholars of the Ashrafi family and continues with his lie that he has not attended any functions of FUREC; and continues to try and cause division and friction among Sunni Scholars he has nevertheless resigned and got himself out of FUREC.
After the way Jilani Miya has behaved in the past, Anjuman e Garib Nawaz didn’t expect him to resign from FUREC. The fact that he has done so albeit kicking and screaming is a step in the right direction.
However, Anjuman e Garib Nawaz has learnt that Jilani Miya will have to repent in accordance with the rules of Sharia to satisfy Sharia’s ruling against him of being an infidel before he can re-enter the fold of Islam.
Anjuman e Garib Nawaz is nevertheless extremely pleased that as a result of the pressure brought to bear upon Jilani Miya he has resigned from FUREC after steadfastly refusing to do so. We hope and pray that he complies with the edicts of the Muftis of Islam and listens to their advice as to repenting in accordance with the rules of Sharia.
Jilani Miya’s resignation but non-condemnation of FUREC and failure to repent for his actions can be compared to the situation in Sharia where a dog falls into a well, dies and makes the water impure. As a starting point the dog must be removed from the well so that the process of purification of the water in the well can commence, and which can subsequently become pure and drinkable.
Jilani Miya’s resignation is the equivalent of the dog being removed from the well – now he must comply with whatever the Muftis of Islam ask him to do and repent to ensure his faith becomes clean and pure and so that he can re-enter the fold of Islam.
We wait patiently for Jilani Miya to comply with Sharia’s ruling and hope and pray that he takes swift, decisive and proper action.
We also hope and pray that those who have been supporting Jilani Miya come to their senses and repent and condemn FUREC as an organisation which seeks to destroy Islam under the banner of unity.
ANJUMAN E GARIB NAWAZ
DEWSBURY
Also read 'An Important Declaration' - A Critique
SEPTEMBER 2006
IMPORTANT CLARIFICATION FROM SAYYAD MUHAMMAD ARABI MIYA,
SAYYAD HASHIM & MAWLANA SAYYAD TALHA ASHRAF
Recently Anjuman e Garib Nawaz (Dewsbury) exposed the lie printed by Jilani Miya claiming that he had not attended or been involved in any function or programme of FUREC (see ‘Jilani Miya’s Biggest Lie in the Declaration of Truth Exposed’ !
Instead of condemning the lies peddled by Jilani Miya in his book and more recently in the ‘Important Declaration’ containing notice of his resignation from FUREC, Muftis Shamsuddoha Farooqi’s sons circulated photographs of Arabi Miya, Hashim Miya and Mawlana Talha Ashraf (brother, son-in-law and nephew of Jilani Miya) attending the FUREC programme held on 24 November 2004 in Lucknow, India.
Anjuman e Garib Nawaz has made its own enquiries and has learnt that all three mentioned above attended the programme at the invitation of Jilani Miya not knowing that it was a programme launching the UP Chapter of FUREC, not understanding what FUREC was or what its aims and objectives were; and in the belief that it was a programme dealing with the subject of education as a delegation from the UK on an education related trip visiting India which included Ashrafi murids was also attending the programme.
Notwithstanding the above Arabi Miya, Hashim Miya and Mawlana Talha Ashraf nevertheless repented unconditionally for their attendance at this programme as soon as they became aware of the aims and objectives of FUREC.
In addition, and consistent with the deception of the Farooqis of Blackburn, a photograph of Mawlana Sayyad Qasim Ashraf was also circulated sitting next to the former Mayor of Blackburn who was part of the UK delegation visiting India. Contrary to what the Farooqis have implied, this photograph was not taken at the programme on 24 November 2004 as Qasim Miya did not attend that programme.
Anjuman e Garib Nawaz is pleased to have once exposed the mischief of the Farooqis of Blackburn and is delighted that people who attended a function not knowing what FUREC was are still prepared to repent regardless of whether it was required in Sharia unlike Jilani Miya and his Farooqi friends who continue to believe that FUREC does not contain any infidelity and apostasy.
ANJUMAN E GARIB NAWAZ
DEWSBURY
Also read :
Zafar Iqbal Farooqi & FUREC
AUGUST 2006
HAS JILANI MIYA CUT HIS LINKS WITH THE FAROOQIS?
Has the unthinkable happened and Jilani Miya severed his friendship and links with the Farooqis of Blackburn?
Anjuman e Garib Nawaz asks this question because Jilani Miya’s Spiritual Foundation website previously had a link to the 'Abul Ghaus website' managed by the Farooqis, which has now been removed along with the video recording Jilani Miya made in the Farooqis home in which he passionately defended them.
This now means that there is not a single mention or defence of the Farooqis on the Spiritual Foundation website. This is in addition to the pamphlet defending the Farooqis published by the Sufi Foundation (another of Jilani Miya’s organisations) also having been removed earlier.
Anjuman e Garib Nawaz is surprised at this sudden course of action taken by Jilani Miya. There maybe a number of reasons for this abrupt change – maybe Jilani Miya would be kind enough to answer the questions we have taken the trouble to ask:
Is it possible that Jilani Miya has seen a little sense and removed the link to a site which includes extremely insulting material against the Scholars and members of his family and which contains numerous falsehoods?
Is it possible that Jilani Miya has also seen and accepted the authentic books confirming the ancestry of the Farooqis and now believes that what they have been claiming is false; and they are not in fact sayyads?
Is it possible that Jilani Miya is seething with anger after having recently seen the document condemning him and his involvement in FUREC signed by members of the Ashrafi family and which has also been signed by the Molvis of the Farooqi family?
Is it possible that Jilani Miya is angry with the Farooqis for providing a link to another website allegedly from the sayyads of Baskhari Sharif (see our pamphlet ‘Mufti Shamsuddoha’s sons exposed’) in which Jilani Miya and his ancestors are being accused of not being sayyads and where his grandfather Hazrat Mohaddis e Azam e Hind (May Allah’s blessings be upon him) is being accused of being a Shia?
Is it possible that Jilani Miya is angry with the Farooqis for providing a link to a website allegedly from the sayyads of Baskhari Sharif in which Jilani Miya’s great great grandfather Ala Hazrat Ashrafi Miya (May Allah’s blessings be upon him) is incessantly and deliriously insulted?
Is it possible that Jilani Miya has learnt that it is actually the Farooqis of Blackburn who are managing the website allegedly from the sayyads of Baskhari containing insults, and making accusations against Ala Hazrat Ashrafi Miya and Hazrat Mohaddis e Azam e Hind (May Allah’s blessings be upon them)?
Is it possible that Jilani Miya has learnt that it is actually the Farooqis of Blackburn who are managing a website making accusations against him that he is not a sayyad?
Is it possible that Jilani Miya is incandescent with rage after learning that the young men of the Farooqi family have stooped so low that they are insulting their own mother who is the sister of Jilani Miya?
Is it possible that Jilani Miya is absolutely furious with the young men of the Farooqis who have stooped so low that they are insulting their own wives; two of whom are the daughters of Jilani Miya; as well as two others who are related to him?
Is it possible that Jilani Miya has once again fallen out with Molvi Abul Hasan Farooqi who was his sworn enemy until recently when they entered into a marriage of convenience to jointly fight their battles?
Or is Jilani Miya taking the first steps in his attempt to repent and withdraw from FUREC - especially now the Scholars of India are uniting and declaring FUREC as an organisation containing infidelity and apostasy and as a result declaring anyone becoming its member an infidel?
Anjuman e Garib Nawaz doesn’t have the answers and that is why it seeks answers from Jilani Miya. However, it is very surprising that Jilani Miya has taken this step when the misguided Farooqis are desperately trying to defend him for his involvement in FUREC at a time when the majority of Sunni Scholars are declaring his membership to be apostasy.
Will we see the link return on the Spiritual Foundation to the website managed by the Farooqis once they bring this pamphlet to the attention of Jilani Miya or has he had enough of defending the indefensible Farooqis and decided that he will now wash his hands of them and leave them to their destructive fate?
We hope and pray that Jilani Miya repents and returns to the fold of Islam before he is condemned unanimously in writing by Sunni Scholars who have reached a consensus on the infidelity contained in FUREC.
We hope and pray that the Farooqis of Blackburn realise the destructive path they are on and repent. May Allah give them guidance to enable them to accept their ancestry and stop making false claims of being sayyads.
ANJUMAN E GARIB NAWAZ
DEWSBURY
AUGUST 2006
Mufti Shamshuddoha's Sons Abusive Activities Exposed
- Shocking Proof Revealed !
The Baskari Sharif website containing insults and abuse of the Ashrafi family
in Kichoccha Sharif has been created and managed by Mufti Shamsudduha's
sons - conclusive proof provided by Anjuman e Gharib Nawaz.
This short article has been written to highlight the depths to which Mufti Shamsudduha's sons have sunk in order to try and deflect attention from the fact that they are not a sayyad family. With conclusive proof we can show that the abuse and insults contained in www.baskharisharif.com and directed at the esteemed personalities of the sayyads of Kichoccha Sharif including Ala Hazrat Ashrafi Miya and Hazrat Mohaddis e Azam e Hind (Blessings be upon them) including the allegation that they were of the Shia faith has been propagated by Mufti Shamsudduha and his sons living in Blackburn UK.
Some of this material was distributed by post in Blackburn in June 2006; and recently this as well as additional material containing more insults, abuse and false claims have also appeared on the internet. Anjuman e Garib Nawaz strongly suspected that this was the activity of Mufti Shamsuddoha's sons (see Mufti Shamsuddoha's sons abuse their own mother article) as the styles of Rehmani Farooqi (youngest son of Mufti Shamsuddoha) and his 'Abul Gaus' website. The 'Baskhari sharif' website and the 'Abul Gaus' websites were almost identical as was the improper and inaccurate use of the English language.
However Anjuman e Garib Nawaz can now provide conclusive evidence despite the claims of innocence that www.baskharisharif.com has been created and managed by the sons of Mufti Shamsudduha and the abusive material contained on the website is being propagated only by them.
Once the readers have carefully digested the contents of this article we have no doubt that they will agree with our conclusion that it is compulsory for every Sunni Muslim who fears Allah Almighty and has hopes of salvation to stay away from the corrupt, immoral, abusive, mischievous, dishonest, destructive and fraudulent behaviour of Mufti Shamsudduha and his sons.
_____________________________________________________________________
Anjuman e Garib Nawaz recently wrote that the www.baskharisharif.com website containing insults, abuse, false and inaccurate information including material previously printed and circulated claiming the sayyads of Kichoccha Sharif were not in fact sayyads was probably the work of Mufti Shamshuddoha's sons since they have become desperate and disillusioned at the fact that their status, wealth, prestige and honour has been wiped out overnight as a result of historical information being discovered and researched conclusively proving beyond any doubt that they are not a sayyad family.
In response to Anjuman e Garib Nawaz's claim in its previous leaflet Mufti Shamsudduha's sons on the ''Abul gaus'' website which they manage posted their reply in multi colour print. In this response they refer to us as 'Anjuman e Fiteens' (fiteens means mischief makers) and state the following:
''Now try to think about this. The website anjuman-e-fitteen are referring to could be managed/created by anyone who is close to the people of Baskhari. The articles/documents/images etc on that site could only be possession of sayed's of Baskhari. Now instead of contacting and asking why they have done this and whether there is any truth in all this, the fiteens took the easiest and callous way out by blaming the family Hazrat Moulana Mufti Sayed Shamsuzzoha (Allah Safeguard him). You have been writing and insulting anyone and everyone; so what's stopping you from attacking the people of baskhari. Ask your pir saheb to find a book written by a deobandi and then call it authentic, after that create a website/distribute pamphlets in which you can insult the people of Baskhari. People like you will then get a satisfaction out of it because that's the nature of a fiteen. We only provided a link so that fiteens like you and your pir saheb will stop the insults.
Stop making false claims and try to understand the real problem. You along with your pir saheb have been throwing allegations to sadats of dhawa sharif and we have been answering all your dim-witted questions. So instead of writing articles, spend that time talking to your pir saheb about this matter and don't try and lessen the issue by bringing the name of sayed jilani mian or his sisters, daughters etc. You have corrupted yourself morally. Do not get down to the level of gutter pest. Every time you write an insulting article your drop a notch close to them.’
(Taken from the ''Abul Gaus'' website - word for word)
The above garbled and emotional response is their defence to the accusation that they had created and were managing 'Baskhari Sharif website' and not anyone in Baskhari Sharif. Their defence contains claims of innocence, provides an odd explanation, passes judgement and gives advice.
Mufti Shamsudduha's sons boldly and innocently wrote that they have nothing to do with the 'Baskhari Sharif website' and asked Anjuman e Garib Nawaz to contact the sayyad's of Baskhari to seek clarification as allegedly only they would have the information printed on their website. They also ask that since we have been insulting 'anyone and everyone' what is stopping us from insulting the people of Baskhari? In addition they state that we have taken a 'callous' way out in our claim that it was Mufti Shamsudduha's sons who had created the website.
Now that this innocence has been proclaimed and Mufti Shamsudduha's sons have not only declared but put in writing the fact that the creation of 'Baskhari Sharif website' has nothing to do with them we would like to put before our readers the following evidence and ask them to take an objective decision:
To try and determine the registrant of a domain name and therefore the creator of a website a search can be carried out on the internet on the www.whois.net website as well other sites. It is a relatively simple search and once the name of the website is entered details of who the domain name holder and who manager of the website is appears.
We firstly carried out a search for the ''Abul Gaus'' website on www.whois.net and the following details appeared:
_____________________________________________________________________
Registrant: Rehmani ''Sayed'' 14 Park Avenue Domain name: ABULGHAUS.COM Administrative Contact: 14 Park Avenue +44.8709220699 Fax: +44.1332864161 Technical Contact: Castle Square +44.8709220699 Fax: +44.1332864161 Registrar of Record: TUCOWS, INC. Record last updated on 01-Jul-2006.
'WHOIS information for
Abul Gaus.com:
[whois.opensrs.net]
Blackburn,
BB1 8BT
GB
Rehmani Sayed
sayedrehmani@yahoo.co.uk
Blackburn,
Blackburn BB1 8BT
GB
On Behalf of a customer, StreamlineNet
info@streamline.net
Melbourne,
Derbyshire
DE73 8DY
GB
Record expires on 01-Jul-2007.
Record created on 01-Jul-2006.
_____________________________________________________________________
The above information provides clear evidence that ‘Rehmani Sayed' (should be Rehmani Farooqi) youngest son of Mufti Shamshuddoha is the 'Registrant' for the ''Abul Gaus'' website which also provides that the ‘record was created on 1 July 2006. Rehmani Farooqi cannot and will not deny that it is him and his polluted brothers who are running this website.
Now look at the same search carried out for ''baskharisharif.com'' website : _____________________________________________________________________
[whois.advantage-interactive.com] domain: BASKHARISHARIF.COM owner-c: AI-40435 nserver: ns2.streamlinedns.co.uk nserver: ns1.streamlinedns.co.uk created: 2006-06-17 19:27:19 expires: 2008-06-17 18:27:19 changed: 2006-06-28 10:30:14 contact-handle: AI-0002 organisation: Telivo Ltd phone: +44.8700116204 email: support@telivo.com contact-handle: AI-40435 07931708051 fax: email: sayedrehmani@yahoo.co.uk
'WHOIS information for baskharisharif.com:
domain-owner: ashraf sayed
admin-c: AI-40435
tech-c: AI-0002
bill-c: AI-0002
213.171.212.13
213.171.208.13
contact: Hostmaster
address: 10-16 Tiller Rd,
address: Docklands,
address: London.
address: London
address: E14 8PX
address: UK
fax: +44.8700116205
contact: ashraf ''sayed''
organisation:
address:
14 Park Avenue
Blackburn
Lancashire
BB1 8BT
UK
Download above original document pdf file 
Direct from the Whois website
_____________________________________________________________________
Who is the registrant of baskharisharif.com ? We learn from the above details that it is Rehmani Sayed though the ownership name appears as 'ashraf sayed' of 14 Park Avenue, Blackburn, BB1 8BT Rehmani Farooqi’s mobile telephone number is given along with his email address.
The purchaser of the domain name baskharisharif.com, its creator and manager is listed by www.whois.net as the youngest son of Mufti Shamsuddoha.
Both sites are being hosted by the same website hosting company based in England whose details are also given – contrary to what the Farooqis of Blackburn would have us believe, the baskharisharif.com is not being hosted from India.
Now re-read carefully what has been written by Mufti Shamsuddoha's sons on their ''Abul Gaus'' website – the relevant material has been highlighted by us:
‘The website anjuman-e-fitteen are referring to could be managed/created by anyone who is close to the people of Baskhari. The articles/documents/images etc on that site could only be possession of sayed’s of Baskhari. Now instead of contacting and asking why they have done this and whether there is any truth in all this, the fiteens took the easiest and callous way out by blaming the family Hazrat Moulana Mufti Sayed Shamsuzzoha (Allah Safeguard him). You have been writing and insulting anyone and everyone; so what's stopping you from attacking the people of baskhari. Ask your pir saheb to find a book written by a deobandi and then call it authentic, after that create a website/distribute pamphlets in which you can insult the people of Baskhari. People like you will then get a satisfaction out of it because that's the nature of a fiteen. We only provided a link so that fiteens like you and your pir saheb will stop the insults.'
‘Stop making false claims and try to understand the real problem. You along with your pir saheb have been throwing allegations to sadats of dhawa sharif and we have been answering all your dim-witted questions. So instead of writing articles, spend that time talking to your pir saheb about this matter and don’t try and lessen the issue by bringing the name of sayed jilani mian or his sisters, daughters etc. You have corrupted yourself morally. Do not get down to the level of gutter pest. Every time you write an insulting article your drop a notch close to them.’
Can there be anyone more dishonest and devious than the sons of Mufti Shamsuddoha????? The answer is in the evidence provided - Mufti Shamsuddoha's sons are managing the baskharisharif.com website and believed they would not get caught and lied and stated the website had nothing to do with them!
From what they have written and the evidence we have provided we can conclude that:
The denial of having nothing to do with the website has been exposed as a blatant, plain and monstrous white lie. As can be seen from the above information Mufti Shamsuddoha's sons have created and are managing baskharisharif.com.
Stating that we are fiteens as well as our 'pir saheb' has been shown to be cowardly and desperate from Mufti Shamshuddoha's sons. We have been proven to have been absolutely honest and truthful.
The accusation against Anjuman e Garib Nawaz of making false claims is baseless as we have proved beyond any doubt the corrupt nature of Mufti Shamshuddoha's family.
We can now re-word what we claimed in our previous leaflet and state that Mufti Shamshuddoha's sons are doing the following:
They are propagating material which claims that Jilani Miya (who they support) isn't a Sayyad.