UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Mufti Shamshuddoha | Zafar Iqbal Faruqi | Molvi Abul Hasan Faruqi | Rehmani Faruqi |
Background
Mufti Iqbal Chisti's advice re; fake Sayyads; Video
Manaqib-e-Ghausi Photograph
Shijra: Shah Abul Ghaus Faruqi
Manaqib-e-Ghausi background
Manaqib e Ghausi; VideoDialogue with Mufti Shamshuddoha
FUREC Link
Mufti Shamsuddoha & Sons double standards exposed
Mufti Shamshuddoha 'Janasheen of a Stick'
HADRAT SHAH ABUL GHAUS | FUREC & FARUQI | ANJUMAN E GARIB NAWAZ
All the information you see posted in this page and website has been carefully researched, investigated and verified with authentic, reliable and independent sources. We take no pleasure in publishing this type of information but felt it was our duty to warn fellow innocent muslims, of the ongoing treachery and deception of this disgraced family.
Ancestors of Hadrat Shah Abul Ghaus Faruqi Rahmatullahi ta'ala alayh
Shah Abul Ghauth Faruqi s/o
Hadrat Umar al-Faruq Radi Allahu ta'ala anhuShah Muhammad s/o
Shah Abul Khair s/o
Shah Abu Saeed s/o
Shah Ma'aruf s/o
Shah Usmaan s/o
Shah Maah s/o
Shah Chaand s/o
Shah Ma'aruf s/o
Shah Mushayyid s/o
Shah Muhammad s/o
Shah Khizr s/o
Shah Giyasuddin s/o
Shah Taj ud-Din s/o
Shah Izz ud-Din s/o
Shah Abu Faw'aris Sulayman Shah s/o
Numaan Shah s/o
Sultan Ahmad Faruq Shah s/o
Amir Masud s/o
Mawlana Wa'iz Asghar s/o
Mawlana Waiz Akbar s/o
Abul Fatah s/o
Imam Ishaaq s/o
Imam Salem s/o
Hadrat Abdullah s/o
Dayar-e-purab mein ilm aur ulema Ref : pages (296 and 430)
Mufti Shamsuddoha & his sons claim without doubt that they are Hasani sayyads. This allegedly has been accepted for centuries and which has been confirmed in the book 'Manaqib e Ghausi.' It is claimed any other family tree is false.
This is such a vague statement and one which we believe is an absolute and blatant lie. We believe it is only Mufti Shamsuddoha and his sons who have been calling themselves sayyad. His own brother was quite happy to have been referred to as Faruqi [descendent of Hadrat Umar al-Faruq Radi Allahu ta'ala anhu] in a document as important as a college certificate and never felt the need to challenge it. It should also be noted that the name on a college certificate is usually the same name that a child enrols at in school and enrols with in college and university. We believe this name has been used throughout the years of education of Massihuzzama who rightly never felt the need to question this, neither did his father when certificates and school reports must have been brought back home…unless Mufti Shamsuddoha and his sons are implying or going to imply that his name was changed by deed poll at some stage during his education from sayyad to Faruqi???
And from what we understand other members of Mufti Shamsuddoha's family have previously said that they are of Faruqi descent and we firmly believe it is only Mufti Shamsuddoha who claims to be a sayyad.
As far as 'Manaqib e Ghausi' is concerned the claim is entirely bogus. Mawlana Muhammad Ahmed Misbahi who is the head teacher at Darul Ulum Ashrafiya Mubarakpur went to Dhawa in 1397 AH and copied the entire book Manakib e Ghausi.
This book was then used as a reference to show the family tree of Hadrat Shah Abul Ghaus Garam Diwan 'alayhir rahman in a book compiled by Mawlana Ahmed ul Qadri. He used the family tree from Manakib e Ghausi which clearly shows that Hadrat Shah Abul Ghaus Garam Diwan 'alayhir rahman was in actual fact a descendant of Hadrat Umar al-Faruq Radi Allahu ta'ala anhu.
If a new version of this book is being printed now or has been recently been printed after being doctored to show that Hadrat Shah Abul Ghaus Garam Diwan was a sayyad, then this will be an act of extreme deviousness and a grave sin against Hadrat Abul Ghaus Shah 'alayhir rahman and all his ancestors. However, this would not come as a complete surprise because if Mufti Shamsuddoha and his sons can lie about Hadrat Shah Abul Ghaus 'alayhir rahman being buried in Dhawa, then they can lie about a family and have a book printed that suits them.
Now see the latest video evidence regarding Manaqib-e-Ghausi