The Light of Truth

For the Respect and Honour of Islam

Introduction

 

All the information you see posted in this page and website has been carefully researched, investigated and verified with authentic, reliable and independent sources.  We take no pleasure in publishing this type of information but felt it was our duty to warn fellow innocent muslims, of  the ongoing treachery and deception of this disgraced family.

 

 

 top

 

 

Background

 


Mufti Shamsuddoha of Blackburn, UK, and his outspoken sons are still falsely claiming to being Sayyad (direct descendents of the Beloved Prophet Muhammad - Peace & Blessings upon him and his true progeny) & are now furiously campaigning for the misguided Jilani mia & Furec. Despite overwhelming evidence proving their lineage from their own sources, they are still shamefully trying to deceive and con innocent muslims in the UK and abroad.

 
They deceived the khanqah [house] of the Ashrafiya sadaat of Kicchocha Shareef, and are now resorting to unspeakable amounts of gutter level abuse, lies and distortion. This unjustified abuse and slander has been directed at His Eminence Raees al-Muhaqiqeen Shaykh al-Islam Hadrat Allama Pir Sayyad as-Shah Muhammad Madani miya al-Ashrafi al-Jilani [May Allah preserve & protect him]; Janasheen-e-Huzur Muhaddith al-A'zam al-Hind Rahmatullahi ta'ala alayh and Shaykh al Islam's younger brother Shaykh al-Tariqat Hadrat Ghazi al-Millat Allama wa Mawlana Pir Sayyad as-Shah Muhammad Hashmi miya al-Ashrafi al-Jilani. Their latest fitna was to distribute booklets calling Hadrat Shaykh al Islam and Ghazi al Millat kafirs [disbelievers], without any justification or evidence. All this because they have been exposed as treachorous liars.

 

 

 

 

 top 

 

 

Mufti Iqbal Chisti on Fake Sayyads

 
 
 
 
 
 

Photo of Manaqib-e-Ghausi




Manaqib-e-Ghausi is the most authentic source to prove the lineage of Hadrat Shah Abul Ghaus Faruqi 'alayhir rahman. As you can can see from the image below the lineage shows the name of Amir al-Momineen Hadrat Umar-e-Faruq Radi Allahu ta'ala anhu. Therefore Hadrat Shah Abul Ghaus 'alayhir rahman was never a Sayyad, never claimed to be Sayyad and his descendents never claimed to be Sayyad, THAT IS apart from Mufti Shamsuddoha & his devious sons. Watch the video for the full explanation.













Shijra : Shah Abul Ghaus

 

Ancestors of Hadrat Shah Abul Ghaus Faruqi Rahmatullahi ta'ala alayh

 

 

Shah Abul Ghauth Faruqi s/o

Shah Muhammad s/o
Shah Abul Khair s/o
Shah Abu Saeed s/o
Shah Ma'aruf s/o
Shah Usmaan s/o
Shah Maah s/o
Shah Chaand s/o
Shah Ma'aruf s/o
Shah Mushayyid s/o
Shah Muhammad s/o
Shah Khizr s/o
Shah Giyasuddin s/o
Shah Taj ud-Din s/o
Shah Izz ud-Din s/o
Shah Abu Faw'aris Sulayman Shah s/o
Numaan Shah s/o
Sultan Ahmad Faruq Shah s/o
Amir Masud s/o
Mawlana Wa'iz Asghar s/o
Mawlana Waiz Akbar s/o
Abul Fatah s/o
Imam Ishaaq s/o
Imam Salem s/o
Hadrat Abdullah s/o
Hadrat Umar al-Faruq Radi Allahu ta'ala anhu


 

Dayar-e-purab mein ilm aur ulema Ref : pages (296 and 430)

 


 
 

 

Manaqib-e-Ghausi background

 

Mufti Shamsuddoha & his sons claim without doubt that they are Hasani sayyads. This allegedly has been accepted for centuries and which has been confirmed in the book 'Manaqib e Ghausi.' It is claimed any other family tree is false.


This is such a vague statement and one which we believe is an absolute and blatant lie. We believe it is only Mufti Shamsuddoha and his sons who have been calling themselves sayyad. His own brother was quite happy to have been referred to as Faruqi [descendent of Hadrat Umar al-Faruq Radi Allahu ta'ala anhu] in a document as important as a college certificate and never felt the need to challenge it. It should also be noted that the name on a college certificate is usually the same name that a child enrols at in school and enrols with in college and university. We believe this name has been used throughout the years of education of Massihuzzama who rightly never felt the need to question this, neither did his father when certificates and school reports must have been brought back home…unless Mufti Shamsuddoha and his sons are implying or going to imply that his name was changed by deed poll at some stage during his education from sayyad to Faruqi???


And from what we understand other members of Mufti Shamsuddoha's family have previously said that they are of Faruqi descent and we firmly believe it is only Mufti Shamsuddoha who claims to be a sayyad.


As far as 'Manaqib e Ghausi' is concerned the claim is entirely bogus. Mawlana Muhammad Ahmed Misbahi who is the head teacher at Darul Ulum Ashrafiya Mubarakpur went to Dhawa in 1397 AH and copied the entire book Manakib e Ghausi.


This book was then used as a reference to show the family tree of Hadrat Shah Abul Ghaus Garam Diwan 'alayhir rahman in a book compiled by Mawlana Ahmed ul Qadri. He used the family tree from Manakib e Ghausi which clearly shows that Hadrat Shah Abul Ghaus Garam Diwan 'alayhir rahman was in actual fact a descendant of Hadrat Umar al-Faruq Radi Allahu ta'ala anhu.


If a new version of this book is being printed now or has been recently been printed after being doctored to show that Hadrat Shah Abul Ghaus Garam Diwan was a sayyad, then this will be an act of extreme deviousness and a grave sin against Hadrat Abul Ghaus Shah 'alayhir rahman and all his ancestors. However, this would not come as a complete surprise because if Mufti Shamsuddoha and his sons can lie about Hadrat Shah Abul Ghaus 'alayhir rahman being buried in Dhawa, then they can lie about a family and have a book printed that suits them.

 

 

 

Now see the latest video evidence regarding Manaqib-e-Ghausi 

 

 

 

 

Manaqib e Ghausi Video NEW

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dialogue with Mufti Shamsuddoha



Hadrat Shaykh al-Islam Allama Pir Sayyad Muhammad Madani Ashrafi al-Jilani tried to make contact with Mufti Shamsuddoha through various sources on numerous occasions, but to no avail. There are many witnessess, ulema and sadat-i kiram who can vouch for this. However it does not surprise us that Mufti Sahib & his family have tried to deny this because this is just another excuse from a family who have been involved in wholesale deceptions.


Shaykh al-Islam has tried to contact Mufti Shamsuddoha for several months to discuss with him what his position was regarding the FUREC issue but Mufti Shamsuddoha despite being the deputy of the Muhaddith al-A'zam Mission [UK] deliberately avoided meeting Shaykh al-Islam, did not telephone and did not reply to any of the correspondence or to any of the messages sent to him. When Shaykh al-Islam was due to arrive in the UK Mufti Shamsuddoha quickly disappeared to India to allegedly visit his frail father.
 

It is also important to note that it is only within the last two months that it has been conclusively discovered with documentary evidence that Mufti Shamsuddoha was not a sayyad. Until authentic documentary evidence was not found those who knew of this remained silent despite knowing about this issue for well over a year.




If Mufti Shamsuddoha had the mettle to remain in the UK and face Shaykh ul Islam he could have asked the questions the writer asks directly himself. Of course he would never have been able to do so because he has been on the run avoiding Shaykh al Islam for several months so that he would not have to deal with the FUREC issue face to face with Shaykh al Islam.

 



When Shaykh al Islam felt that Mufti Shamsuddoha was avoiding him and wasn't prepared to
discuss the question of his lineage, Shaykh al Islam suspended Mufti Shamsuddoha from his post in the Muhaddith al-A'zam Mission [UK] – If Mufti Shamsuddoha still feels aggrieved, why does he not go and meet with Shaykh al Islam and deal with this issue and show his family tree. What is he afraid of? Is it that the false family tree that has been created will be found out??